UEFA’s exceptional decision: Barcelona and Milan to host games abroad

In a landmark decision that has stirred both intrigue and criticism, UEFA’s Executive Committee has granted exceptional permission for two domestic league fixtures — one in LaLiga and one in Serie A — to be played outside their home countries. The governing body emphasised that these approvals are extraordinary exceptions rather than a sea change in policy.

The approved matches are: Barcelona vs Villarreal, to be held in Miami in December, and AC Milan vs Como, to be staged in Perth, Australia in early February. The Italian decision is driven by a logistical necessity: San Siro, the shared stadium for Milan, will be preparing to host the Winter Olympics opening ceremony on February 6, placing constraints on its availability for domestic fixtures.

UEFA’s permission, however reluctant, reflects tensions between the established traditions of European football and growing commercial ambitions. On one hand, UEFA reaffirmed a strong principle: league matches should be played on home soil, to avoid disenfranchising local supporters and preserving competitive integrity. On the other hand, the decision writers acknowledged that FIFA’s regulatory framework currently lacks clarity and enforceable detail regarding domestic matches staged abroad — a regulatory grey zone that makes outright rejection risky.

Critics warn that this may be a turning point. Faithful supporters and fan groups argue that relocating games undermines the local emotional bonds that define club identity and cultivates a slippery slope toward further commercialization. In the view of some commentators, this is not just one-off relocation, but a breach of a barrier that could invite more clubs to chase overseas opportunities.

UEFA officials insisted these approvals do not constitute a precedent. They pledged to engage with FIFA and national associations to close loopholes, ensuring stricter rules in the future. To forestall further requests, UEFA also called on national leagues to consult the governing body before proposing any more matches abroad. Meanwhile, fan organisations such as Football Supporters Europe have urged that all competitions remain anchored in local communities.

From the perspective of LaLiga and Serie A executives, the decision carries potential benefits. Playing in international venues can expand global exposure, reach diasporic supporters, and generate additional commercial revenue. For Milan, the relocation is a practical necessity born of the Olympics schedule; for Barcelona and Villarreal, the Miami event aligns with long-term efforts to globalize LaLiga’s appeal.

Nevertheless, backlash is expected. Many local fans, especially those of the “home” team in each match, may feel disenfranchised or excluded. The additional travel burden, time‐zone disruptions, and environmental costs also raise questions. Critics argue these two instances may be harbingers rather than anomalies.

In summary, UEFA’s reluctant approval of Milan and Barcelona to play domestic matches abroad marks a delicate compromise. It acknowledges commercial pressures and logistical realities while trying to hold firm to the tradition and integrity of domestic leagues. Whether this balance holds or breaks will depend on how strongly the various stakeholders — clubs, fans, national associations, and FIFA — resist or embrace the path ahead.

uefa